The Seleucid repression started under Antiochus. He supported the priests with their animal sacrifice and persecuted the prophets who did not accept it. Antiochus wanted a consistent approach to worship across his dominions. Many prophets moved north to places like Galilee. They started to worship in homes and in synagogues. They used their "idol" ( a term used in I Maccabees) altars (like the Migdal stone) to burn the incense, replicating what they had done in the temple sanctuary. They would see the smoke rise and smell the pleasant odour which would remind them of the Spirit of God and the temple. They also built mikveh to immerse themselves in water as a symbol of the cleansing they had received by God's Spirit. This defiance led to more Seleucid persecution.
It was Judas who restored the prophets to power. He defeated the military challenge of the Seleucids, purged the temple of the priests, dismantled the altar for burnt offerings, replaced the stolen furniture and curtains in the sanctuary, and restored the daily sacrifice of incense in the sanctuary. The prophets became friends of the Jewish kings and the Romans. Later, post the revolt, the Church Fathers gave the name of Judas to the betrayer of Jesus in their newly created religion of Christianity.
The prophetic books of the bible (representing more than a half of the OT) testify to the prophet's disillusion with the priests, and animal sacrifice as a means of cleansing. The peshers (commentaries) on the prophetic books by the priests testify to the priest's disillusion with the prophets who they called "seekers of smooth things", meaning that they didn't conform to the priest's view of the law.
As the confidence and power of the priests increased up to 66 CE, so did their persecution of the prophets. They killed Agrippa the Great (alias James) a principal prophet and a friend of Nero. Agrippa's troops were defeated by the priests. (This was misclaimed by the Church Fathers in the writings attributed to Josephus as a defeat of Cestius's Roman soldiers.) These two events led Nero to invade Judea and tackle the priests who had occupied the fortresses of Masada, Qumran and Machaerus, as well as invading the Citadel to get their Scrolls. The priests also controlled Jerusalem, but not the temple which was defended by the prophets. The so-called first revolt was thus a local affair between priests and the Roman forces under Nero. It was over in less than one month after Nero landed with his two legions at Caesarea. First, the prophets opened the gates of Jerusalem at night and let the Roman army in. The priests were no match for Nero's army which probably numbered about 8000 soldiers. The three fortresses were stormed. Many priests were put in prison. No siege tactics were used anywhere. The story of the war in the writings attributed to Josephus was a fraud perpetrated by the Church Fathers. Josephus never existed. He was invented by the Church Fathers. Vespasian misclaimed the victory. He never fought his way down through Galilee and Samaria. The temple remained as it was before the so-called First Revolt.
There was then five years of peace in Judea. Immediately after the war Nero went to Greece leaving some soldiers to keep order. For the people of Judea, things returned to normal. Marriages were made and land was bought and sold. Under the prophets, worship continued in the sanctuary of the temple. Little did the prophets know what was ahead. History was going to be repeated. Persecution of the prophets would return. Only this time it would be by the Romans, not the Greek Seleucids. A perfect storm was brewing for the Romans which would spread all over the Mediterranean world. Vespasian came to be emperor during the fifth year of the peace in Judea. He stole the temple treasure as though it was a spoil of his fake war. He ordered the destruction of the temple and in doing so stirred up a hornet's nest. There was great unrest and wars in the Jewish world all around the Mediterranean. Hadrian had the massive task to finish off the prophetic movement along with the prophet's hope of rebuilding the temple, and resuming the daily sacrifice of incense in sanctuary. The prophets, once loyal to the Romans, had been betrayed. (Judaism was then dominated by the priests again who later became the rabbis.) Many prophets (800 or so) were taken to Rome to celebrate Vespasian's misclaimed triumph. A large number of prophets and their followers fled to the northern areas like Galilee where there already existed prophetic Jews from the time of Antiochus. These became the future rebels of the Bar Kokhba revolt which contrary to popular belief was not centred in Judea but in Galilee. In fact the revolt was to spread around the whole Mediterranean.
The recent excavations at Megiddo show that Vespasian never went to the Galilee. (Also there is absolutely no archaeological evidence that Vespasian ever did go to Galilee. There is only the say so in the writings attributed to Josephus). Matthew Adams, head of the Albright Institute and co-director of the dig said (as reported by Ilan Ben Zion (see http://www.timesofisrael.com/in-first-imperial-roman-legionary-camp-uncovered-near-megiddo/): "that whereas the first Jewish revolt against Rome in the first century CE was waged in the Galilee and farther south in Judea, the Bar Kochba Revolt of 132 CE mostly took place in the hills near Jerusalem and comparatively less in the north." How strange? The permanent camp at Megiddo was built at the time of the Bar Kokhba revolt. It housed an estimated 5000 soldiers who were no doubt rested before another group came in from battle. This was not simply a holding tactic but a sign of the extensive long battles fought in the northern areas for which there were large numbers of Roman casualties. That this was the Bar Kokhba revolt was denied recently by Danny Syon of the Israel Antiquities Authority. He wrote (see http://www.academia.edu/Messages?atid=11183068): "So far there is not a single unequivocal archaeological evidence for any activity connected with the Bar Kokhba revolt north of about the line of Tel Aviv." Syon is wrong - Megiddo. Syon wrote: "There is tons of Roman military ammunition and equipment found at Gamla, all dated to the Early Roman period". Tons of equipment left behind means that the Romans threw everything into the battle for Gamla (just one of many of the northern places destroyed by Hadrian's forces) and incurred many casualties.